[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4A0AEAC80200007800000BC3@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:44:08 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...ell.com>
To: "Tejun Heo" <TeHeo@...ell.com>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: remap allocator for per-CPU memory
>>> Tejun Heo <teheo@...ell.com> 13.05.09 15:29 >>>
>> (b) teach the pageattr code to handle the per-CPU virtual area similarly to
>> the kernel space for x86-64 (though it's going to be a little more complicated
>> since there's no pre-determined relation between the virtual and physical
>> addresses - the necessary lookup might become expensive on systems with
>> very many [possible] CPUs).
>
>Can you elaborate this a bit? Let's sya there's quick way to match
>whether the page is part of the remapped large page, what can pageattr
>do differently then? Applying the same attribute to both mappings?
>Failing or filtering set_memory_*()?
It would have to split the page. Perhaps there wouldn't be a need to apply the
new attribute to the page(s) that is(are) in the process of getting its(their)
attribute(s) changed; instead, just don't re-establish a 4k mapping for those
pages that aren't part of the per-CPU space.
And of course, the request should fail when it targets one of the pages that
are actually part of the per-CPU space -- but would be a BUG() anyway.
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists