[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1242222475.26820.22.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 15:47:55 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
Vatsa <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arun Bharadwaj <arun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Saving power by cpu
evacuationsched_max_capacity_pct=n
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 19:15 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> [2009-05-13 15:14:57]:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 18:41 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> > > * Peter Zijlstra wanted more justifications for throttling at the core
> > > level. Throttling may be a resource management problem rather than
> > > scheduler/load balancer
> >
> > No, I mandate that it be thermal management. Any other reason and you've
> > got a NAK.
>
> We've been discussing hard limits from the resource management view
> point. Bharata is working on a RFC that we should be able to share
> soon
Right, and you well know I dislike them.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists