linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/14] score - New architecure port to SunplusCT S+CORE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200905141044.56426.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Thu, 14 May 2009 10:44:55 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	liqin.chen@...plusct.com
Cc:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/14] score - New architecure port to SunplusCT S+CORE

Hi Liquin,

Have you had a chance to look at the asm-generic header files I posted
a few times?

I think it would be ideal if you can change your code to use the
asm-generic version whereever possible, by replacing your files
with something like

arch/score/include/asm/foo.h:
#include <asm-generic/foo.h>

In particular, all of the exported header files that get included
in user space should use only the asm-generic version, with the
exception of byteorder.h, elf.h and ptrace.h, which are by definition
architecture specific.

Please tell me if you find problems in the generic header files during
the conversion.

	Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/