[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090514175332.9B7B.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 17:54:29 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at mm/slqb.c:1411!
> On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 17:37 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 May 2009 16:42:37 +0900 (JST)
> > KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hmm. I don't know slqb well.
> > So, It's just my guess.
> >
> > We surely increase l->nr_partial in __slab_alloc_page.
> > In between l->nr_partial++ and call __cache_list_get_page, Who is decrease l->nr_partial again.
> > After all, __cache_list_get_page return NULL and hit the VM_BUG_ON.
> >
> > Comment said :
> >
> > /* Protects nr_partial, nr_slabs, and partial */
> > spinlock_t page_lock;
> >
> > As comment is right, We have to hold the l->page_lock ?
>
> Makes sense. Nick? Motohiro-san, can you try this patch please?
This issue is very rarely. please give me one night.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists