[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090514092854.GF1365@ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:28:54 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver-core: devtmpfs - driver core maintained /dev
tmpfs
Hi!
> > so just to state the obvious: this code is not needed to boot fast.
> > It is mostly a workaround for having a bad initrd; if you don't use an
> > initrd, or if you use an initrd that's made with the right device nodes
> > in it already, you really just don't need this.
> >
> > I would much rather that you just fix your initrd... than to put this
> > sort of thing into the kernel....
>
> How will you solve the dynamic device numbers? They are a complete
> reality today.
Maybe dynamic device numbers are bad idea to start with?
I'd like to keep static /dev, thank you... With big enough major/minor
space (which we have today, I believe), complexity of dynamic device
numbers can and should be avoided.
Plus... this patch 'hardcoded' device names. Why not 'hardcode'
device numbers in the same way, so that static /dev keeps working?
Namespace should be big enough...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists