[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A0BE8CA.7080801@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 12:47:54 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
CC: kvm@...r.kernel.org, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davidel@...ilserver.org
Subject: Re: [KVM PATCH v7 2/3] kvm: add support for irqfd via eventfd-notification
interface
Gregory Haskins wrote:
> KVM provides a complete virtual system environment for guests, including
> support for injecting interrupts modeled after the real exception/interrupt
> facilities present on the native platform (such as the IDT on x86).
> Virtual interrupts can come from a variety of sources (emulated devices,
> pass-through devices, etc) but all must be injected to the guest via
> the KVM infrastructure. This patch adds a new mechanism to inject a specific
> interrupt to a guest using a decoupled eventfd mechnanism: Any legal signal
> on the irqfd (using eventfd semantics from either userspace or kernel) will
> translate into an injected interrupt in the guest at the next available
> interrupt window.
>
> r = 1;
> break;
> case KVM_CAP_COALESCED_MMIO:
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm.h b/include/linux/kvm.h
> index 3db5d8d..dfc4bcc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -415,6 +415,7 @@ struct kvm_trace_rec {
> #define KVM_CAP_ASSIGN_DEV_IRQ 29
> /* Another bug in KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION fixed: */
> #define KVM_CAP_JOIN_MEMORY_REGIONS_WORKS 30
> +#define KVM_CAP_EVENTFD 31
>
Let's keep a fine granularity and call it IRQFD.
> +
> +int
> +kvm_deassign_irqfd(struct kvm *kvm, int fd)
> +{
> + struct _irqfd *irqfd, *tmp;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
> +
> + /*
> + * linear search isn't brilliant, but this should be a infrequent
> + * operation and the list should not grow very large
> + */
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(irqfd, tmp, &kvm->irqfds, list) {
> + if (irqfd->fd != fd)
> + continue;
>
Please fget() the new fd and compare the filps; fds aren't meaningful in
the kernel. You can also drop _irqfd::fd.
It may also be useful to compare the gsi, this allows a
"make-before-break" switchover:
- guest reroutes irq to a different gsi
- associate irqfd with new gsi
- disassociate irqfd from old gsi
> +
> + irqfd_release(irqfd);
> + mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
> + return 0;
>
Don't return, userspace may have multiple associations?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists