[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A0C2297.5040001@panasas.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 16:54:31 +0300
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
jens.axboe@...cle.com, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] block: completion related functions cleanup
On 05/11/2009 11:56 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> This is a minor cleanup on the completion releated functions. It is on
> the top of Tejun's unify request processing model patchset.
>
>
Hi Tomo, Jens, Tejun.
A small left-over from this grate cleanup work. I think it was Tejun's
patch that left this unused.
(Should go through block tree)
Here:
---
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 16:46:03 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] scsi_lib: remove unused variable assignment
The last request completion cleanup in scsi_lib left an unused
this_count assignment in scsi_io_completion().
(It was used before in a code segment that now uses blk_end_request_all())
Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index e410d66..f8600d6 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -789,7 +789,6 @@ void scsi_io_completion(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd, unsigned int good_bytes)
*/
if (scsi_end_request(cmd, error, good_bytes, result == 0) == NULL)
return;
- this_count = blk_rq_bytes(req);
error = -EIO;
--
1.6.2.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists