| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20090514150632.GG10933@one.firstfloor.org> Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 17:06:32 +0200 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>, Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>, Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Vatsa <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>, Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Arun Bharadwaj <arun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Saving power by cpu evacuation sched_max_capacity_pct=n > I think 'scheduler throttling' is good so that we avoid the term 'CPU > throttling' or core throttling. I had named this cpu evacuation or > core evacuation just to avoid confusion with hardware throttling. Evacuation sounds good, although shouldn't it be package or socket evacuation? -Andi -- ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists