[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090514155204.GA6273@fancy-poultry.org>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 17:52:04 +0200
From: Heinz Diehl <htd@...cy-poultry.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Joseph Cihula <joseph.cihula@...el.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, andi@...stfloor.org,
chrisw@...s-sol.org, jmorris@...ei.org, jbeulich@...ell.com,
peterm@...hat.com, gang.wei@...el.com, shane.wang@...el.com,
John Gilmore <gnu@...d.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3][PATCH 2/2] intel_txt: Intel(R) TXT and tboot kernel
support
On 13.05.2009, Theodore Tso wrote:
> Ross Anderson was one of the first to write about these concerns, over
> five years ago:
>
> http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/tcpa-faq.html
>
> It's interesting that his 2003 document was able to predict the
> emergence of the LaGrande Technology (see question 15 in the above
> FAQ).
Many thanks for pointing this out!
Strange enough, nobody seems to care. I have carefully read Ross Andersons
report, and I'm more than concerned now. Because I'm not a kernel
programmer, I can not see by myself what these patches will do to the Linux
kernel at all, so I can only hope that Linus will not let them in if they
can be misused to what Ross Anderson describes in his paper.
Regards,
Heinz.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists