linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mmtom: Prevent shrinking of active anon lru list in case of no swap space V3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090514162201.GA2361@cmpxchg.org>
Date:	Thu, 14 May 2009 18:22:01 +0200
From:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To:	Minchan Kim <barrioskmc@...il.com>
Cc:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	MinChan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmtom: Prevent shrinking of active anon lru list in case of no swap space V3

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:39:49PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:27 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
> <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >>  mm/vmscan.c |    2 +-
> >>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> >> index 2f9d555..621708f 100644
> >> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> >> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> >> @@ -1577,7 +1577,7 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone,
> >>         * Even if we did not try to evict anon pages at all, we want to
> >>         * rebalance the anon lru active/inactive ratio.
> >>         */
> >> -       if (inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc))
> >> +       if (inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc) && nr_swap_pages > 0)
> >>                shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, zone, sc, priority, 0);
> >
> >
> >       if (nr_swap_pages > 0 && inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc))
> >
> > is better?
> > compiler can't swap evaluate order around &&.
> 
> If GCC optimizes away that branch with CONFIG_SWAP=n as Rik mentioned,
> we don't have a concern.

It can only optimize it away when the condition is a compile time
constant.

But inactive_anon_is_low() contains atomic operations which the
compiler is not allowed to drop and so the && semantics lead to

	atomic_read() && 0

emitting the read while still knowing the whole expression is 0 at
compile-time, optimizing away only the branch itself but leaving the
read in place!

Compared to

	0 && atomic_read()

where the && short-circuitry leads to atomic_read() not being
executed.  And since the 0 is a compile time constant, no code has to
be emitted for the read.

So KOSAKI-san's is right.  Your version results in bigger object code.

	Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/