linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: clear N_HIGH_MEMORY map before se set it again -v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090514095414.ba8356e5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 14 May 2009 09:54:14 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	mel@....ul.ie, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
	cl@...ux-foundation.org, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, steiner@....com, rientjes@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: clear N_HIGH_MEMORY map before se set it again
 -v2

On Thu, 14 May 2009 09:43:22 -0700
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:

> 
> incase some system strange SRAT table. some kind of small range.
> or with mem= etc
> 

That description is very hard to understand.  Please provide more details.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <Yinghai@...nel.org>
> Tested-by: Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>

What reason did Jack have to test this?  Perhaps he hit some bug? 
If so, please fully describe that bug in the changelog.


> Index: linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -4041,6 +4047,11 @@ void __init free_area_init_nodes(unsigne
>  						early_node_map[i].start_pfn,
>  						early_node_map[i].end_pfn);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * find_zone_movable_pfns_for_nodes/early_calculate_totalpages init
> +	 * that node_mask, clear it at first
> +	 */
> +	nodes_clear(node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]);
>  	/* Initialise every node */
>  	mminit_verify_pageflags_layout();
>  	setup_nr_node_ids();

If CONFIG_HIGHMEM=n, this will clear the N_NORMAL_MEMORY entry in
node_states[].  Why is this correct and desirable?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/