[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1242321000.6642.1456.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 19:10:00 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Micha__ Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Physical Memory Management [0/1]
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 10:07 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 14 May 2009 15:04:55 +0200
> Micha__ Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@...sung.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 14 May 2009 14:05:02 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > And who says your pre-allocated pool won't fragment with repeated PMM
> > > use?
> >
> > Yes, this is a good question. What's more, there's no good answer. ;)
> >
>
> We do have capability in page reclaim to deliberately free up
> physically contiguous pages (known as "lumpy reclaim").
>
> It would be interesting were someone to have a go at making that
> available to userspace: ask the kernel to give you 1MB of physically
> contiguous memory. There are reasons why this can fail, but migrating
> pages can be used to improve the success rate, and userspace can be
> careful to not go nuts using mlock(), etc.
>
> The returned memory would of course need to be protected from other
> reclaim/migration/etc activity.
I thought we already exposed this, its called hugetlbfs ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists