[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87eiurzfkd.wl%vmayatsk@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 20:48:18 +0200
From: Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@...il.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@...il.com>, sandeen@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] sys_write() should write all valid data
At Thu, 14 May 2009 14:02:34 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Ok all in all I don't think this is a good way to handle this problem.
> Hopefully somebody smarter than I will speak up, but what you are trying to do
> here is have your cake and eat it too. You want to get the size of what we were
> able to fault in and return that, which should be a size_t,
btw, fault_in_pages_readable() has argument `size' of type int...
> but you also want to
> throw back an error if something happened, which needs a signed value. I think
> the best way to handle this would be to make check_readable_bytes return size_t,
> and then if you get an EFAULT back, have it return 0. Then the caller can say
> "hey I couldn't fault anything in, let me make what I want to fault in smaller",
> and then if that fault returns 0 we can exit.
Won't it be suboptimal to trap in the same place twice?
> I hope thats helpful/correct :).
--
wbr, Vitaly
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists