linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.27.19 + 28.7: network timeouts for r8169 and 8139too

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <1242328457.32579.12.camel@lap75545.ornl.gov>
Date:	Thu, 14 May 2009 15:14:17 -0400
From:	David Dillow <dave@...dillows.org>
To:	Michael Riepe <michael.riepe@...glemail.com>
Cc:	Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
	Rui Santos <rsantos@...popie.com>,
	Michael Büker <m.bueker@...lin.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.27.19 + 28.7: network timeouts for r8169 and 8139too

On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 20:37 +0200, Michael Riepe wrote:
> 
> David Dillow wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 22:29 +0200, Michael Riepe wrote:
> > The patched driver runs on 2.6.27 and survives my 5 minutes 'dd
> > if=/dev/zero bs=1024k | nc target 9000' test which usually dies in less
> > than 90 seconds on 2.6.28+.
> 
> Not on my system:

> This happened less than half a minute after the transfer had started.
> And it's going to happen earlier if I increase the load. With four
> connections to two other hosts, the transmission usually pauses after
> less than ten seconds. Sometimes it lasts for only two or three seconds.

Bummer, but a good data point; thanks for testing.

I added some code to print the irq status when it hangs, and it shows
0x0085, which is RxOK | TxOK | TxDescUnavail, which makes me think we've
lost an MSI-edge interrupt somehow. You being able to reproduce it on
2.6.27 where I cannot leads me to think that the bisection down into the
genirq tree just changed the timing and made it easier to hit after it
was merged.

So, I suppose a good review of the IRQ handling of r8169.c is in order,
though my SATA disks (AHCI w/ MSI irqs) also seem to have similar issues
with delays, though that is entirely unqualified and unmeasured.

Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/