[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090514200829.GE30963@in.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 01:38:29 +0530
From: "K.Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@....ibm.com>,
maneesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 00/12] Hardware Breakpoint interfaces
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 04:02:16PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2009, K.Prasad wrote:
>
> > Hi Alan,
> > Please find a new set of patches with the following changes.
> > I am eager to know if you think that they are ready for submission towards
> > upstream acceptance.
>
> This is looking pretty good. Only one thing caught my eye:
> switch_to_thread_hw_breakpoint and switch_to_none_hw_breakpoint do
> nothing but call the corresponding arch-specific routines. You might
> as well eliminate them and have the callers invoke the arch-specific
> routines instead.
>
> Alan Stern
>
Sure. I will eliminate the above two functions and also remove the msleep()
call in ftrace startup selftest code path.
With these two changes I plan to submit the code for -tip acceptance
directly.
I wish to thank you profusely for the in-depth code reviews,
suggestions, unearthing corner-case issues and the immense time and effort
taken for the same. The patch wouldn't have been as better but for your
involvement!
Thanks,
K.Prasad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists