[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020905150323m76cdd775p87abec356e355d37@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 13:23:14 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Floris Kraak <randakar@...il.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Trivial Patch Monkey <trivial@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kbuild: Disable the -Wformat-security gcc flag
Hi!
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Floris Kraak <randakar@...il.com> wrote:
> Some distributions have enabled the gcc flag -Wformat-security by default.*
> This results in a number of warnings about format arguments to
> functions, sometimes in cases where fixing the warning is not likely
> to actually fix a bug.
> Instead of hand patching a dozens of places (possibly more) that
> produce warnings that get ignored anyway we just turn off the flag in
> the Makefile.
>
> Note: Regardless of any discussion surrounding the value of this
> particular type of warning, having this show up in a few distributions
> but not in the
> vast majority of them means that this warning won't be seen by most of
> the developers who introduce the new warnings in the first place. If
> the
> kernel decides it cares about format arguments it should do so
> globally regardless of distribution. In which case I'd gladly whip up
> a patch to do
> the reverse thing and turn this thing on by default. However, such a
> patch would have to produce a follow up patch(set) which fixes each
> individual
> warning.
>
> See also:
> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/11/20/4215134
>
> *) The ubuntu manpage for gcc states:
>
> -Wformat-security
> If -Wformat is specified, also warn about uses of format
> functions that represent possible security problems. At present, this
> warns about
> calls to "printf" and "scanf" functions where the format
> string is not a string literal and there are no format arguments, as
> in "printf
> (foo);". This may be a security hole if the format string
> came from untrusted input and contains %n. (This is currently a
> subset of what
> -Wformat-nonliteral warns about, but in future warnings may
> be added to -Wformat-security that are not included in
> -Wformat-nonliteral.)
>
> NOTE: In Ubuntu 8.10 and later versions this option is
> enabled by default for C, C++, ObjC, ObjC++. To disable, use
> -Wno-format-security, or
> disable all format warnings with -Wformat=0. To make format
> security warnings fatal, specify -Werror=format-security.
>
> Signed-off-by: Floris Kraak <randakar@...il.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 7715b2c..9ee766c 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -346,7 +346,8 @@ KBUILD_CPPFLAGS := -D__KERNEL__
>
> KBUILD_CFLAGS := -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs \
> -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common \
> - -Werror-implicit-function-declaration
> + -Werror-implicit-function-declaration \
> + -Wno-format-security
> KBUILD_AFLAGS := -D__ASSEMBLY__
>
> # Read KERNELRELEASE from include/config/kernel.release (if it exists)
Is there a reason this patch was not merged? Yes, it's clearly a
distro problem but apparently there's no easy way to turn it off.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists