[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090515000725.GA27084@ldl.fc.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 18:07:25 -0600
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@...rix.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] x86/PCI: Enable scanning of all pci functions
* Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>:
> On Thu, 14 May 2009 11:45:47 -0700
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
>
> > Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > Anyway it's not a big deal, this code is already ugly (a 0 define
> > > for all arches? why?) so you shouldn't have to spend too much time
> > > cleaning it up.
> > >
> >
> > OK, how's this as a delta (I can fold it into the previous patch if
> > you're OK with it):
> >
> > Subject: [PATCH] pci: add HAVE_ARCH_PCIBIOS_SCAN_ALL_FNS
> >
> > Jesse objected to the "#undef pcibios_scan_all_fns"'s ugliness,
> > so replace it with the more common HAVE_ARCH_ idiom.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
> > Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
>
> That's slightly better. It looks like we should just get rid of
> pcibios_scan_all_fns altogether, but this is fine for now.
It's been on my TODO list for a while now, but then holiday and
now surgery got in the way.
/ac
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists