[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090515134717.GA16389@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 15:47:17 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jake Edge <jake@....net>, Alan@...a.kernel.org,
security@...nel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>, Linux@...a.kernel.org,
List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
Arjan@...a.kernel.org, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, stable@...nel.org,
Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [Security] [patch] random: make get_random_int() more random
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 May 2009, Jake Edge wrote:
> >
> > It seems like this should be queued up for stable, yes? I just
> > saw the 2.6.29.4 review patches go out, but this wasn't part of
> > it ...
>
> Well, I was hoping to maybe have actual timing numbers from some
> better hash, in case Matt can make one that is efficient enough.
> So I committed the randomness improvement as a clear _improvement_
> over what we had, but it may not be the final version.
yep, it was just a quick hack really. If someone can do a stronger
hash that also happens to be faster i guess we all will be happy
campers. The performance figures showed room for improvement - how
well are those hashes optimized? Many thousands of cycles ... is
that really justified?
> That said, I guess the same argument can be used for pushing it
> towards stable too. Even if we end up doing something fancier, the
> patch is clearly not any worse than what we have currently.
Agreed. Havent seen any issues due to it. Jake, mind bouncing the
commit notification to stable@...nel.org?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists