[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0905150814180.3343@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 08:16:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] kgdb,i386: use address that SP register points to
in the exception frame
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Jason Wessel wrote:
>
> The treatment of the SP register is different on x86_64 and i386.
> This is a regression fix that lived outside the mainline kernel from
> 2.6.27 to now. The regression was a result of the original merge
> consolidation of the i386 and x86_64 archs to x86.
>
> The incorrectly reported SP on i386 prevented stack tracebacks from
> working correctly in gdb.
Is this only ever used for kernel register state?
Because in the _general_ case, the code should likely be something like
if (user_mode_vm(regs)) {
gdb_regs[GDB_SS] = regs->ss;
gdb_regs[GDB_SP] = regs->sp;
} else {
gdb_regs[GDB_SS] = __KERNEL_DS;
gdb_regs[GDB_SP] = (unsigned long)®s->sp
}
if the 'regs' contents can ever point to user mode state.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists