[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090515162818.26209.82481.stgit@dev.haskins.net>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:28:18 -0400
From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avi@...hat.com
Subject: [KVM PATCH v2 3/4] kvm: add io_bus unregister function
We want to support the notion of dynamic MMIO/PIO registrations and
therefore will need to support both register as well as unregister.
However, the current io_bus code is structured as a linear array and
is not conducive to unregistering, so refactor to allow "holes" in the
array. We then enhance the API with an unregister function.
Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
---
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 4 +++-
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index 94c1a11..214089f 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ extern struct kmem_cache *kvm_vcpu_cache;
* in one place.
*/
struct kvm_io_bus {
- int dev_count;
+ spinlock_t lock;
#define NR_IOBUS_DEVS 6
struct kvm_io_device *devs[NR_IOBUS_DEVS];
};
@@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ struct kvm_io_device *kvm_io_bus_find_dev(struct kvm_io_bus *bus,
gpa_t addr, int len, int is_write);
int kvm_io_bus_register_dev(struct kvm_io_bus *bus,
struct kvm_io_device *dev);
+int kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev(struct kvm_io_bus *bus,
+ struct kvm_io_device *dev);
struct kvm_vcpu {
struct kvm *kvm;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 60ba0cf..5f5e443 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -2433,16 +2433,18 @@ static struct notifier_block kvm_reboot_notifier = {
void kvm_io_bus_init(struct kvm_io_bus *bus)
{
memset(bus, 0, sizeof(*bus));
+ spin_lock_init(&bus->lock);
}
void kvm_io_bus_destroy(struct kvm_io_bus *bus)
{
int i;
- for (i = 0; i < bus->dev_count; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < NR_IOBUS_DEVS; i++) {
struct kvm_io_device *pos = bus->devs[i];
- kvm_iodevice_destructor(pos);
+ if (pos)
+ kvm_iodevice_destructor(pos);
}
}
@@ -2451,10 +2453,10 @@ struct kvm_io_device *kvm_io_bus_find_dev(struct kvm_io_bus *bus,
{
int i;
- for (i = 0; i < bus->dev_count; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < NR_IOBUS_DEVS; i++) {
struct kvm_io_device *pos = bus->devs[i];
- if (pos->in_range(pos, addr, len, is_write))
+ if (pos && pos->in_range(pos, addr, len, is_write))
return pos;
}
@@ -2463,12 +2465,42 @@ struct kvm_io_device *kvm_io_bus_find_dev(struct kvm_io_bus *bus,
int kvm_io_bus_register_dev(struct kvm_io_bus *bus, struct kvm_io_device *dev)
{
- if (bus->dev_count > (NR_IOBUS_DEVS-1))
- return -ENOSPC;
+ int i;
- bus->devs[bus->dev_count++] = dev;
+ spin_lock(&bus->lock);
- return 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < NR_IOBUS_DEVS; i++) {
+ if (bus->devs[i])
+ continue;
+
+ bus->devs[i] = dev;
+ spin_unlock(&bus->lock);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ spin_unlock(&bus->lock);
+
+ return -ENOSPC;
+}
+
+int kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev(struct kvm_io_bus *bus, struct kvm_io_device *dev)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ spin_lock(&bus->lock);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NR_IOBUS_DEVS; i++) {
+
+ if (bus->devs[i] == dev) {
+ bus->devs[i] = NULL;
+ spin_unlock(&bus->lock);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ }
+
+ spin_unlock(&bus->lock);
+
+ return -ENOENT;
}
static struct notifier_block kvm_cpu_notifier = {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists