[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090515113114.68ae93ae.zaitcev@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:31:14 -0600
From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH block#for-2.6.31 1/3] ub: use __blk_end_request_all()
On Sat, 16 May 2009 00:14:35 +0900, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> @@ -834,12 +829,7 @@ static void ub_end_rq(struct request *rq
> error = -EIO;
> rq->errors = scsi_status;
> }
> - rqlen = blk_rq_bytes(rq); /* Oddly enough, this is the residue. */
> - if (__blk_end_request(rq, error, cmd_len)) {
> - printk(KERN_WARNING DRV_NAME
> - ": __blk_end_request blew, %s-cmd total %u rqlen %ld\n",
> - blk_pc_request(rq)? "pc": "fs", cmd_len, rqlen);
> - }
> + __blk_end_request_all(rq, error);
> }
I applaud this. We needed blk_end_this_mudafakin_request() for a long time.
Why two underscores?
-- Pete
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists