linux-kernel - Re: Misleading OOM messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1242411307.28257.25.camel@nimitz>
Date:	Fri, 15 May 2009 11:15:07 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	Peter Ziljstra <a.p.ziljstra@...llo.nl>,
	San Mehat <san@...roid.com>, Arve Hj?nnev?g <arve@...roid.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Misleading OOM messages

On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 13:57 -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > If you misconfigured cgroups, you give more memory to them.
> 
> If you do not have enough memory in a cgroup then your application should
> slow down (because of page evictions) but the system should not OOM.
> Are cgroups broken or why are you getting OOMs when using them?

See mm/oom_kill.c::mem_cgroup_out_of_memory().  A group itself can have
an OOM done on it.  It's not a system-wide oom.  We just need to ensure
that we continue to differentiate the cgroup-specific oom message from
the general one.  Maybe also include some more cgroup info in the debug
outbut.

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/