| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20090515181639.GH4451@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 23:46:39 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
"lizf@...fujitsu.com" <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
"menage@...gle.com" <menage@...gle.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <m-kosaki@...es.dti.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Low overhead patches for the memory cgroup controller
(v2)
* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> [2009-05-16 02:45:03]:
> Balbir Singh wrote:
> > Feature: Remove the overhead associated with the root cgroup
> >
> > From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > This patch changes the memory cgroup and removes the overhead associated
> > with LRU maintenance of all pages in the root cgroup. As a side-effect, we
> > can
> > no longer set a memory hard limit in the root cgroup.
> >
> > A new flag is used to track page_cgroup associated with the root cgroup
> > pages. A new flag to track whether the page has been accounted or not
> > has been added as well.
> >
> > Review comments higly appreciated
> >
> > Tests
> >
> > 1. Tested with allocate, touch and limit test case for a non-root cgroup
> > 2. For the root cgroup tested performance impact with reaim
> >
> >
> > +patch mmtom-08-may-2009
> > AIM9 1362.93 1338.17
> > Dbase 17457.75 16021.58
> > New Dbase 18070.18 16518.54
> > Shared 9681.85 8882.11
> > Compute 16197.79 15226.13
> >
> Hmm, at first impression, I can't convice the numbers...
> Just avoiding list_add/del makes programs _10%_ faster ?
> Could you show changes in cpu cache-miss late if you can ?
> (And why Aim9 goes bad ?)
OK... I'll try but I am away on travel for 3 weeks :( you can try and run
this as well
> Hmm, page_cgroup_zoneinfo() is accessed anyway, then...per zone counter
> is not a problem here..
>
> Could you show your .config and environment ?
> When I trunst above numbers, it seems there is more optimization/
> prefetch point in usual path
>
> BTW, how the perfomance changes in children(not default) groups ?
>
I've not seen the impact of that. I'll try.
> > 3. Tested accounting in root cgroup to make sure it looks sane and
> > correct.
> >
> Not sure but swap and shmem case should be checked carefully..
>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >
> > include/linux/page_cgroup.h | 10 ++++++++++
> > mm/memcontrol.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > mm/page_cgroup.c | 1 -
> > 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/page_cgroup.h b/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> > index 7339c7b..8b85752 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> > @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ enum {
> > PCG_LOCK, /* page cgroup is locked */
> > PCG_CACHE, /* charged as cache */
> > PCG_USED, /* this object is in use. */
> > + PCG_ROOT, /* page belongs to root cgroup */
> > + PCG_ACCT, /* page has been accounted for */
> Reading codes, this PCG_ACCT should be PCG_AcctLRU.
OK
>
> > };
> >
> > #define TESTPCGFLAG(uname, lname) \
> > @@ -46,6 +48,14 @@ TESTPCGFLAG(Cache, CACHE)
> > TESTPCGFLAG(Used, USED)
> > CLEARPCGFLAG(Used, USED)
> >
> > +SETPCGFLAG(Root, ROOT)
> > +CLEARPCGFLAG(Root, ROOT)
> > +TESTPCGFLAG(Root, ROOT)
> > +
> > +SETPCGFLAG(Acct, ACCT)
> > +CLEARPCGFLAG(Acct, ACCT)
> > +TESTPCGFLAG(Acct, ACCT)
> > +
> > static inline int page_cgroup_nid(struct page_cgroup *pc)
> > {
> > return page_to_nid(pc->page);
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index 9712ef7..18d2819 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
> >
> > struct cgroup_subsys mem_cgroup_subsys __read_mostly;
> > #define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES 5
> > +struct mem_cgroup *root_mem_cgroup __read_mostly;
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP
> > /* Turned on only when memory cgroup is enabled && really_do_swap_account
> > = 0 */
> > @@ -196,6 +197,10 @@ enum charge_type {
> > #define PCGF_CACHE (1UL << PCG_CACHE)
> > #define PCGF_USED (1UL << PCG_USED)
> > #define PCGF_LOCK (1UL << PCG_LOCK)
> > +/* Not used, but added here for completeness */
> > +#define PCGF_ROOT (1UL << PCG_ROOT)
> > +#define PCGF_ACCT (1UL << PCG_ACCT)
> > +
> > static const unsigned long
> > pcg_default_flags[NR_CHARGE_TYPE] = {
> > PCGF_CACHE | PCGF_USED | PCGF_LOCK, /* File Cache */
> > @@ -420,7 +425,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(struct page *page, enum
> > lru_list lru)
> > return;
> > pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> > /* can happen while we handle swapcache. */
> > - if (list_empty(&pc->lru) || !pc->mem_cgroup)
> > + if ((!PageCgroupAcct(pc) && list_empty(&pc->lru)) || !pc->mem_cgroup)
> > return;
> > /*
> > * We don't check PCG_USED bit. It's cleared when the "page" is finally
> > @@ -429,6 +434,9 @@ void mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(struct page *page, enum
> > lru_list lru)
> > mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
> > mem = pc->mem_cgroup;
> > MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru) -= 1;
> > + ClearPageCgroupAcct(pc);
> > + if (PageCgroupRoot(pc))
> > + return;
> > list_del_init(&pc->lru);
> > return;
> > }
>
>
> > @@ -452,8 +460,8 @@ void mem_cgroup_rotate_lru_list(struct page *page,
> > enum lru_list lru)
> > * For making pc->mem_cgroup visible, insert smp_rmb() here.
> > */
> > smp_rmb();
> > - /* unused page is not rotated. */
> > - if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
> > + /* unused or root page is not rotated. */
> > + if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc) || PageCgroupRoot(pc))
> > return;
> > mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
> > list_move(&pc->lru, &mz->lists[lru]);
> > @@ -477,6 +485,9 @@ void mem_cgroup_add_lru_list(struct page *page, enum
> > lru_list lru)
> >
> > mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
> > MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru) += 1;
> > + SetPageCgroupAcct(pc);
> > + if (PageCgroupRoot(pc))
> > + return;
> > list_add(&pc->lru, &mz->lists[lru]);
> > }
> I think set/clear flag here adds race condtion....because pc->flags is
> modfied by
> pc->flags = pcg_dafault_flags[ctype] in commit_charge()
> you have to modify above lines to be
>
> SetPageCgroupCache(pc) or some..
> ...
> SetPageCgroupUsed(pc)
Good Point
>
> Then, you can use set_bit() without lock_page_cgroup().
> (Currently, pc->flags is modified only under lock_page_cgroup(), so,
> non atomic code is used.)
OK.. I wonder if we can say, the _ACCT and _ROOT flags under
zone->lru_lock. I have not seen the locks held under commit_charge
fully, but we could potentially do that. Need some more thinking.
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists