[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0905151358430.26559@qirst.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 13:59:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
cc: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Peter Ziljstra <a.p.ziljstra@...llo.nl>,
San Mehat <san@...roid.com>, Arve Hj?nnev?g <arve@...roid.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Misleading OOM messages
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Ok, so kernel should be fixed to make limits 30% of non-mlocked
> memory.
There is already ulimit.
> > folks. They go sucking up and locking as much memory as they can get
> > their hands on. Adding memory never helps them because they'll use up
> > whatever is there.
>
> Well, but it is uncommon everywhere else. If you have desktop system,
> job size is pretty much constant. If you have too little memory, you
> OOM.
Nope. If you have too little memory for your app then the kernel pages
portions of the app out to disk. Thats is why you have a VM (VIRTUAL
machine). The app is not running with physical memory.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists