[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0905151528480.13433@qirst.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 15:29:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Peter Ziljstra <a.p.ziljstra@...llo.nl>,
San Mehat <san@...roid.com>, Arve Hj?nnev?g <arve@...roid.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Misleading OOM messages
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Perhaps we should ensure that total RAM mlock()ed + vm_dirty_bytes is
> always under total ram. That'll force people to either stop mlocking or
> do the safe thing which is drop vm_dirty_bytes.
Guess a global mlock ratio would be good? Set it at a reasonable limit of
10% and tell the user that the system may OOM if set too high.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists