[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A0EC42D.2080905@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 22:48:29 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
CC: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>,
Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@...hat.com>,
Eric Moore <Eric.Moore@....com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH block#for-2.6.31 2/3] block: set rq->resid_len to blk_rq_bytes()
on issue
Hello, Sergei.
Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>> Heh... there's a reason I mentioned the original commit. The original
>> code was
>>
>> if (ret > 0) {
>> /* positive number is the untransferred residual */
>> rsp->data_len = ret;
>> req->data_len = 0;
>> ret = 0;
>> } else if (ret == 0) {
>> rsp->data_len = 0;
>> req->data_len = 0;
>> }
>>
>
> But still,
>
> req->data_len = 0;
>
> is common between both branches, so could be moved after the *if*
> statement.
Yeah, sure, feel free to submit a patch, but I don't know. Does it
even matter at all as long as the intention is clear?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists