[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090516075746.4b8f3ed6@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 07:57:46 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: lkml@...ethan.org
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
security@...nel.org, Linux@...a.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Arjan@...a.kernel.org,
List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Alan@...a.kernel.org,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, Jake Edge <jake@....net>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Security] [patch] random: make get_random_int() more random
On Sat, 16 May 2009 09:28:16 -0500
"Michael S. Zick" <lkml@...ethan.org> wrote:
>
> Still getting kernel messages that there isn't a test for the rng - -
> One (of many) ways to test the quality is to submit a bit string
> sample to the Berlekamp-Massey algorithm; perhaps from repeated calls
> to the generation function (it depends on your desired confidence
> level).
>
or we bite the bullet and implement the Fortuna PRNG algorithm
and feed it as much as we can, rather than caring if any if the sources
is not 100.000% perfect.
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists