linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kmemcheck: make bitfield annotations be valid C

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84144f020905152340j40701892v65124740a80c7cf6@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 16 May 2009 09:40:32 +0300
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmemcheck: make bitfield annotations be valid C

(adding viro to cc)

On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com> wrote:
>> From bb8926742d87da95aeb373bc2d4b35a554c5001b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
>> Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 21:34:36 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] kmemcheck: make bitfield annotations be valid C
>>
>> According to Al Viro, the syntax we were using (putting #ifdef inside
>> macro arguments) was not valid C. He also suggested using begin/end
>> markers instead, which is what we do now.
>>
>> Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
>> Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
>
> Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
>
> Al, are you okay with this?
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/