linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Double check memmap is actually valid with a memmap has unexpected holes V2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 17 May 2009 17:27:01 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hartleys@...ionengravers.com,
	mcrapet@...il.com, fred99@...olina.rr.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Double check memmap is actually valid with a memmap
	has unexpected holes V2

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 09:39:47AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> It affected at least 2.6.28.4 so minimally, I'd like to see it in for 2.6.30.
> I think it's a -stable candidate but I'd like to hear from the ARM maintainer
> on whether he wants to push it or not to that tree.

I'm inclined to agree.

> > It applies OK to 2.6.28, 2.6.29, current mainline and mmotm, so I'll
> > just sit tight until I'm told what to do.
> > 
> 
> Please merge for 2.6.30 at least. Russell, are you ok with that? Are you ok
> with this being pushed to -stable?

I'll merge it into my master branch, which'll be going to Linus in the next
few days.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/