linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.30-rc kills my box hard

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d82e647a0905161848y25ef1480id4f1914b065c6528@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 17 May 2009 09:48:37 +0800
From:	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.30-rc kills my box hard - and lockdep chains

2009/5/17 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>:
> It is a deep stack trace.
>
> And unfortunately
>
> a) that diagnostic didn't print the stack pointer value, from which
>   we can often work out if we're looking at a stack overflow.
>
> b) I regularly think it would be useful if that stack backtrace were
>   to print out the actual stack address, so we could see how much
>   stack each function is using.

I have the same sense, because lockdep uses many recursion function ,which
may cause stack overflow easily.

>
>   I just went in to hack these things up, but the x86 stacktrace
>   code which I used to understand has become stupidly complex so I
>   gave up.
>
> What tools do we have to diagnose a possible kernel stack overflow?
> There's CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE but that's unlikely to be much use.

-- 
Lei Ming
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/