[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <720338507@web.de>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 20:37:29 +0200
From: devzero@....de
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?
>> Aside from some whitespace issues around some Impact: lines, I
>> don't know of any outstanding problems. (I just pushed an updates
>> to these branches to fix those, and fold a change to address
>> Jesse's comment.)
>>
>> Please tell me if you have any further issues which prevents you
>> from pulling these changes. Otherwise I'd appreciate it if you
>> pulled them soon, as we're already on -rc5, and I have more
>> changes I'd like to prep for the next merge window.
>
>As in the past, my main worry is performance overhead of paravirt in
>general.
>
>The patches that dont affect any native kernel fast path are
>probably OK (but still pending final review).
>
>Regarding patches that do change the fastpath i'll do a round of
>measurements of CONFIG_PARAVIRT against !CONFIG_PARAVIRT kernels,
>and make up my mind based on that.
>
>You could accelerate this by sending some "perf stat" hard numbers
>to give us an idea about where we stand today.
>
> Ingo
maybe this is iust a stupid comment (please forgive, iŽm no advanced kernel
hacker), but canŽt the code inserted by the patches and which changes the
fastpath just #IFDEF`ed at the critical offsets ? (as building a dom0 kernel is
just another build target, isn`t it ?)
regards
roland
______________________________________________________
GRATIS für alle WEB.DE-Nutzer: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://movieflat.web.de
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists