linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #13069] regression in 2.6.29-git3 on SH/Dreamcast

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84144f020905170112l789e9ec0p2bf6bb71879579e1@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 17 May 2009 11:12:35 +0300
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	Adrian McMenamin <adrian@...golddream.info>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
	Manuel Lauss <mano@...rinelk.homelinux.net>
Subject: Re: [Bug #13069] regression in 2.6.29-git3 on SH/Dreamcast

On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 23:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of recent regressions.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.29.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>> (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry     : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13069
>> Subject               : regression in 2.6.29-git3 on SH/Dreamcast
>> Submitter     : Adrian McMenamin <adrian@...golddream.dyndns.info>
>> Date          : 2009-03-29 19:04 (19 days old)
>> References    : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123835353115372&w=4

On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Adrian McMenamin
<adrian@...golddream.info> wrote:
> At this point it *looks* as though it was simply a question of
> insufficient memory to boot, but I think it needs further testing.
> Nobody else seems to have picked it up though.

Yeah, it looks like there's not enough memory to boot. It could well
be that the kernel memory footprint got bigger but I don't think the
bisected commit is at fault here. Perhaps we should just close the
bug?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/