[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090518094501.GB13776@cr0.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 17:45:01 +0800
From: Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Renzo Davoli <renzo@...unibo.it>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
mtk.manpages@...il.com, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ptrace_vm: ptrace for syscall emulation virtual
machines
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 04:27:11PM +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:19:28AM +0200, Renzo Davoli wrote:
>
>>
>>I have successfully tested my paches in various configurations:
>>- patched-kernel running patched-UML
>>- patched-kernel running unpatched-UML
>>- patched-kernel running umview
>>- patched-UML running umview
>>- UML on UML fails in the same way with and without the patch.
>>I am currently running the patched kernel on my laptop.
>
>Thanks, I will give them another testing soon...
Sorry for the long delay...
I reviewed the whole patch set again, and tested it on both i386
and x86_64, it looks very fine!! :-)
So I would like to see these patches to be merged.
Andrew, could you please take these two patches for us??
Thank you!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists