linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] ptrace_vm: ptrace for syscall emulation virtual machines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 May 2009 17:45:01 +0800
From:	Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:	Renzo Davoli <renzo@...unibo.it>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	mtk.manpages@...il.com, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ptrace_vm: ptrace for syscall emulation virtual
	machines

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 04:27:11PM +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:19:28AM +0200, Renzo Davoli wrote:
>
>>
>>I have successfully tested my paches in various configurations:
>>- patched-kernel running patched-UML
>>- patched-kernel running unpatched-UML
>>- patched-kernel running umview
>>- patched-UML running umview
>>- UML on UML fails in the same way with and without the patch.
>>I am currently running the patched kernel on my laptop.
>
>Thanks, I will give them another testing soon...

Sorry for the long delay...

I reviewed the whole patch set again, and tested it on both i386
and x86_64, it looks very fine!! :-)

So I would like to see these patches to be merged.

Andrew, could you please take these two patches for us??

Thank you!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/