linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Low overhead patches for the memory cgroup controller (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 May 2009 19:11:07 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
	"lizf@...fujitsu.com" <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	"menage@...gle.com" <menage@...gle.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <m-kosaki@...es.dti.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Low overhead patches for the memory cgroup controller
 (v2)

On Fri, 15 May 2009 23:46:39 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> [2009-05-16 02:45:03]:
> 
> > Balbir Singh wrote:
> > > Feature: Remove the overhead associated with the root cgroup
> > >
> > > From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > >
> > > This patch changes the memory cgroup and removes the overhead associated
> > > with LRU maintenance of all pages in the root cgroup. As a side-effect, we
> > > can
> > > no longer set a memory hard limit in the root cgroup.
> > >
> > > A new flag is used to track page_cgroup associated with the root cgroup
> > > pages. A new flag to track whether the page has been accounted or not
> > > has been added as well.
> > >
> > > Review comments higly appreciated
> > >
> > > Tests
> > >
> > > 1. Tested with allocate, touch and limit test case for a non-root cgroup
> > > 2. For the root cgroup tested performance impact with reaim
> > >
> > >
> > > 		+patch		mmtom-08-may-2009
> > > AIM9		1362.93		1338.17
> > > Dbase		17457.75	16021.58
> > > New Dbase	18070.18	16518.54
> > > Shared		9681.85		8882.11
> > > Compute		16197.79	15226.13
> > >
> > Hmm, at first impression, I can't convice the numbers...
> > Just avoiding list_add/del makes programs _10%_ faster ?
> > Could you show changes in cpu cache-miss late if you can ?
> > (And why Aim9 goes bad ?)
> 
> OK... I'll try but I am away on travel for 3 weeks :( you can try and run
> this as well
> 
tested aim7 with some config.

CPU: Xeon 3.1GHz/4Core x2 (8cpu)
Memory: 32G
HDD: Usual? Scsi disk (just 1 disk)
(try_to_free_pages() etc...will never be called.)

Multiuser config. #of tasks 1100 (near to peak on my host)

10runs.
rc6mm1 score(Jobs/min)
44009.1 44844.5 44691.1 43981.9 44992.6
44544.9 44179.1 44283.0 44442.9 45033.8  average=44500

+patch
44656.8 44270.8 44706.7 44106.1 44467.6
44585.3 44167.0 44756.7 44853.9 44249.4  average=44482

Dbase config. #of tasks 25
rc6mm1 score (jobs/min)
11022.7 11018.9 11037.9 11003.8 11087.5 
11145.2 11133.6 11068.3 11091.3 11106.6 average=11071

+patch
10888.0 10973.7 10913.9 11000.0 10984.9
10996.2 10969.9 10921.3 10921.3 11053.1 average=10962

Hmm, 1% improvement ?
(I think this is reasonable score of the effect of this patch)

Anyway, I'm afraid of difference between mine and your kernel config.
plz enjoy your travel for now :)

Thanks,
-Kame












--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/