linux-kernel - Re: mmap vs mtime in 2.6.26 and up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 May 2009 07:43:05 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Ferenc Wagner <wferi@...f.hu>
Cc:	Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Staubach <staubach@...hat.com>,
	Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>, xfs@....sgi.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mmap vs mtime in 2.6.26 and up

On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:50:54PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 06:40:29PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> > Thanks for the analysis.  Unfortunately I don't nearly know enough to
> > work on this issue, but would like to track it as it affects our
> > backup system.  So, shouldn't #2645 be reopened again?
> 
> Yes, definitively as the current "fix" is incorrected.  I'll try to cook
> up a correct version once I get some time.

Doing this correctly in the framework of the current codee is
unfortunately not so easy, as calling ->setattr requires taking i_mutex
which we can't in the pagefaul path.

To fix this properly we need to actually update the timestamps during
msync and co as done by the patches from Miklos:

	http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/28/166

and Peter:

	http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/31/176

----- End forwarded message -----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/