[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090518153115.GA22133@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 17:31:15 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Martin Bammer <mrb74@....at>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM List <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Wireless List <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29
On 05/18, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > On 05/17, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13107
> > > > Subject : LTP 20080131 causes defunct processes w/2.6.30-rc1
> > > > Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
> > > > Date : 2009-04-09 15:43 (38 days old)
> > > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b3bfa0cba867f23365b81658b47efd906830879b
> > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123929187208953&w=4
> > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/10/193
> > > > Handled-By : Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > >
> > > Oleg says in that thread that it's as-designed, and followup
> > > questions were not replied to (yet).
> >
> > Yes, I think this is false alarm. Perhaps I missed something, and
> > I am waiting for more info from Kumar, but it looks like ltp was
> > already changed to skip the "{ PTRACE_ATTACH, 1, EPERM }" test on
> > kernels after 2.6.25
>
> Btw., why did the patch (and the revert) make any difference to the
> test? Timing differences look improbable.
Because before this series /sbin/init always ignored SIGSTOP. Now,
ptracer does PTRACE_ATTACH and exits without clearing the pending
SIGSTOP. init dequeues this signal and becomes TASK_STOPPED.
Consider:
$ sleep 1000 &
[1] 875
$ grep State: /proc/`pidof sleep`/status
State: S (sleeping)
$ perl -e 'syscall 101, 16, 0+shift, 0,0' `pidof sleep` # just PTRACE_ATTACH + exit
[1]+ Stopped sleep 1000
$ grep State: /proc/`pidof sleep`/status
State: T (stopped)
This is the "normal" behaviour, afaics the same happens with init now.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists