| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200905181748.41172.bzolnier@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 17:48:40 +0200 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com> To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] drivers/ide Convert printk(KERN_<foo> to pr_<foo>( On Monday 18 May 2009 17:41:28 Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 16:12 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > On Monday 18 May 2009 04:21:08 Joe Perches wrote: > > > Mostly mechanical conversion of printk's > > Hmm.. less mechanical conversion using also dev_*() macros where suitable > > would be much better... > > How's about fixing pr_devel() which currently doesn't seem to be used > > by anything inside kernel to not depend on DEBUG in separate pre-patch > > and then using it instead of pr_debug()? > > How about deferring the "printk(KERN_DEBUG" to something else > and doing the mechanical conversion to core as a first pass, > followed by core pr_<foo> to dev_<foo> where appropriate > as a second pass? Fine with me. > What do you think is appropriate for pr_<foo> to dev_<foo> > conversions? printk()s using drive->name or hwif->name Thanks, Bart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists