[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A119264.9010807@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 11:52:52 -0500
From: David Smith <dsmith@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tracing] ring_buffer question
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2009, David Smith wrote:
>
>> Jon Masters wrote:
>>> [thinking out loud] Does the global disable stuff also disable other
>>> non-tracing ring buffers?
>> I believe it does. If I'm correct, I think it would be a good idea to
>> make that an ftrace-disable feature, not a general ring buffer disable
>> feature.
>
> We can do that when we get more users of the ring buffer and we find it
> makes sense.
It appears that oprofile is already using the ring buffer. With Jon's
stuff as a 2nd non-ftrace-user, doesn't it make sense now?
--
David Smith
dsmith@...hat.com
Red Hat
http://www.redhat.com
256.217.0141 (direct)
256.837.0057 (fax)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists