lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 18 May 2009 11:52:52 -0500
From:	David Smith <dsmith@...hat.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC:	Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tracing] ring_buffer question

Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2009, David Smith wrote:
> 
>> Jon Masters wrote:
>>> [thinking out loud] Does the global disable stuff also disable other
>>> non-tracing ring buffers?
>> I believe it does.  If I'm correct, I think it would be a good idea to
>> make that an ftrace-disable feature, not a general ring buffer disable
>> feature.
> 
> We can do that when we get more users of the ring buffer and we find it 
> makes sense.

It appears that oprofile is already using the ring buffer.  With Jon's
stuff as a 2nd non-ftrace-user, doesn't it make sense now?

-- 
David Smith
dsmith@...hat.com
Red Hat
http://www.redhat.com
256.217.0141 (direct)
256.837.0057 (fax)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ