[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1242674983.4273.8.camel@dyn9047022153>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 12:29:43 -0700
From: Frank Filz <ffilzlnx@...ibm.com>
To: NFS List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
NFS V4 Mailing List <nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Eugene Teo <eugene@...hat.com>, security@...nel.org,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>
Subject: [PATCH] nfs: Fix NFS v4 client handling of MAY_EXEC in
nfs_permission.
Sorry for the resend, got lkml address wrong...
The problem is that permission checking is skipped if atomic open is
possible, but when exec opens a file, it just opens it O_READONLY which
means EXEC permission will not be checked at that time.
This problem is observed by the following sequence (executed as root):
mount -t nfs4 server:/ /mnt4
echo "ls" >/mnt4/foo
chmod 744 /mnt4/foo
su guest -c "mnt4/foo"
Signed-off-by: Frank Filz <ffilzlnx@...ibm.com>
---
fs/nfs/dir.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c
index 370b190..89f98e9 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
@@ -1943,7 +1943,8 @@ int nfs_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
case S_IFREG:
/* NFSv4 has atomic_open... */
if (nfs_server_capable(inode, NFS_CAP_ATOMIC_OPEN)
- && (mask & MAY_OPEN))
+ && (mask & MAY_OPEN)
+ && !(mask & MAY_EXEC))
goto out;
break;
case S_IFDIR:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists