[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1242680389.1572.127.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 13:59:49 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] drivers/ide Convert printk(KERN_<foo> to pr_<foo>(
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 15:56 +0000, James Bottomley wrote:
> What exactly is the point of a mechanical conversion from
> printk(KERN_ ...) to pr_...?
>
> I can see the value of the pr_ macros from new code in that the
> temptation to put a comma after KERN_.. for some people is irresistible
> so it's an interface that's very easy to misuse, but given that we have
> correct uses, why convert them?
Enables easier conversion to dev_<foo> macros
Allows easier prefixing via pr_fmt
Puts back together unnecessarily chopped up format strings
Standardization is good
Just for the hell of it
cheers, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists