linux-kernel - Re: Misleading OOM messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090518154524.GH5156@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 May 2009 23:45:24 +0800
From:	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	Peter Ziljstra <a.p.ziljstra@...llo.nl>,
	San Mehat <san@...roid.com>, Arve Hj?nnev?g <arve@...roid.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Misleading OOM messages

* Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org> [2009-05-18 10:34:22]:

> On Sat, 16 May 2009, Balbir Singh wrote:
> 
> > > But that is a resource control isssue. Should also not say out of memory
> > > but state that the cgroup memory limit was reached.
> > >
> >
> > But we are out of memory for the cgroup under consideration.
> 
> Not necessarily. This only occurs if the cgroup cannot swap or if
> allocations are done that are not swappable.
>

Isn't that the equivalent of out of memory for the system? What would
you like the OOM message to state? 

-- 
	Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/