[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A110768.2040707@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 14:59:52 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
davem@...emloft.net, dada1@...mosbay.com, zbr@...emap.net,
jeff.chua.linux@...il.com, paulus@...ba.org, jengelh@...ozas.de,
r000n@...0n.net, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] v5 expedited "big hammer" RCU grace periods
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> +void sched_expedited_wake(void *unused)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&__get_cpu_var(sched_expedited_done_mutex));
> + if (__get_cpu_var(sched_expedited_done_qs) ==
> + SCHED_EXPEDITED_QS_DONE_QS) {
> + __get_cpu_var(sched_expedited_done_qs) =
> + SCHED_EXPEDITED_QS_NEED_QS;
> + wake_up(&__get_cpu_var(sched_expedited_qs_wq));
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&__get_cpu_var(sched_expedited_done_mutex));
> +}
[...]
> + get_online_cpus();
> + preempt_disable();
> + mycpu = smp_processor_id();
> + smp_call_function(sched_expedited_wake, NULL, 1);
sched_expedited_wake() calls mutex_lock() which may sleep?
And I think you have re-implement workqueue.
Thanks, Lai.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists