[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1242632349-15894-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 03:39:09 -0400
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: [PATCH] virtio_blk: add missing __dev{init,exit} markings
The remove member of the virtio_driver structure uses __devexit_p(), so
the remove function itself should be marked with __devexit. And where
there be __devexit on the remove, so is there __devinit on the probe.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
---
note: i dont actually know anything about virtio_blk, so this isnt
tested in any way. simply noticed the hotplug discrepancies.
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index 5d34764..bc4fabf 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static int index_to_minor(int index)
return index << PART_BITS;
}
-static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
+static int __devinit virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
{
struct virtio_blk *vblk;
int err;
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ out:
return err;
}
-static void virtblk_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
+static void __devexit virtblk_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
{
struct virtio_blk *vblk = vdev->priv;
--
1.6.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists