[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1242720862.20986.7.camel@penberg-laptop>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 11:14:22 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Elladan <elladan@...imo.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
"tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"minchan.kim@...il.com" <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] vmscan: make mapped executable pages the first
class citizen
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 16:12 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 04:05:51PM +0800, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 09:44 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > Its a sekrit conspiracy against bloat by making JIT'd crap run
> > > slower :-)
> > >
> > > <rant>
> > > Anyway, I just checked, we install tons of mono junk for _2_
> > > applications, f-spot and tomboy, both are shite and both have
> > > alternatives not requiring this disease.
> > > </rant>
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 09:44 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > But seriously, like Kosaka-san already said, anonymous pages are treated
> > > differently from file pages and should not suffer the same problems.
> >
> > OK, thanks for the explanation. The comment is a little bit misleading
> > because I got the impression that we don't care about anon exec pages.
>
> Ah yes! Will this one dismiss the possible mis-interception?
>
> /*
> * Identify referenced, file-backed active pages and
> * give them one more trip around the active list. So
> * that executable code get better chances to stay in
> * memory under moderate memory pressure. Anon pages
> modified ==> * are not likely to be evicted by use-once streaming
> modified ==> * IO, plus JVM can create lots of anon VM_EXEC pages,
> modified ==> * so we ignore them here.
> */
> if ((vm_flags & VM_EXEC) && !PageAnon(page)) {
> list_add(&page->lru, &l_active);
> continue;
> }
Yes, it's better. Even I can understand it now :-).
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists