linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] memcg: handle accounting race in swapin-readahead and zap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8c90ea703295420e2fac0a2744d1816a.squirrel@webmail-b.css.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 May 2009 17:28:30 +0900 (JST)
From:	"KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	"Daisuke Nishimura" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc:	"KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"hugh@...itas.com" <hugh@...itas.com>, hannes@...xchg.org,
	"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: handle accounting race in swapin-readahead and
 zap_pte

Daisuke Nishimura wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2009 19:00:27 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
>-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
>                                        |  trylock_page()
>                                        |    try_to_free_swap()
>                                        |      page_swapcount() -> true &
> return
>      swap_info_get()                   |
>        swap_entry_free() == 1          |
>        find_get_page() -> found        |
>        trylock_page() -> fail & return |
>                                        |    unlock_page()
>
> I don't think it happens in practice(unlock_page() would be called soon
> after
> try_to_free_swap() returns), and this patch seems to work well actually.
> I'm not sure whether we should handle this case more strictly or not, but
> I think
> it it would be better to add some comments about it at least.
>
Hmm, ok. maybe trylock in free_swap_and_cache() is the worst thing as
Andrew pointed out...

> And I have a question.
>
> If the size of swap device(or the number of used swap entries not on
> SwapCache)
> is small enough not to hit "if (memcg_swapin_buffer.nr >
> ENOUGH_LARGE_SWAPIN_BUFFER)"
> in mem_cgroup_add_swapin_buffer(), those pages in swapin buffer
> are left and unfreed by swapoff(although swap entries are freed) ?
> Isn't it better to call directly mem_cgroup_drain_swapin_buffer() at the
> end of swapoff ?
>
Hmm, maybe necessary.

> I prefer your v4(remembering only stale swap entries) to be honest,
> but I don't oppose strongly to this direction.
>
I can't believe I can handle complex race with "rememebering only stale".
I'll try to remove trylock in free_swap_and_cache...

Thank you for testing.
-Kmae

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/