[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1M6LvU-0000mN-HN@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 11:48:00 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: jblunck@...e.de
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, bharata@...ibm.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
mszeredi@...e.cz, vaurora@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/32] VFS based Union Mount (V3)
On Mon, 18 May 2009, Jan Blunck wrote:
> Here is another post of the VFS based union mount implementation.
>
> Traditionally the mount operation is opaque, which means that the content of
> the mount point, the directory where the file system is mounted on, is hidden
> by the content of the mounted file system's root directory until the file
> system is unmounted again. Unlike the traditional UNIX mount mechanism, that
> hides the contents of the mount point, a union mount presents a view as if
> both filesystems are merged together. Although only the topmost layer of the
> mount stack can be altered, it appears as if transparent file system mounts
> allow any file to be created, modified or deleted.
>
> Most people know the concepts and features of union mounts from other
> operating systems like Sun's Translucent Filesystem, Plan9 or BSD. For an
> in-depth review of union mounts and other unioning file systems, see:
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/324291/
> http://lwn.net/Articles/325369/
> http://lwn.net/Articles/327738/
>
> Here are the key features of this implementation:
> - completely VFS based
> - does not change the namespace stacking
> - directory listings have duplicate entries removed in the kernel
> - writable unions: only the topmost file system layer may be writable
> - writable unions: new whiteout filetype handled inside the kernel
>
> Major changes since last post:
> - Updated the whiteout patches:
> - DCACHE_WHITEOUT flag set on a negative dentry
> - uses filetype instead of reserved inode number on EXT2
> - Copy-up directories during lookup
> - Implemented fallthru support for in-kernel readdir() as proposed by
> Valerie Aurora (Henson)
Does this copy up directories persistently? If so, does this
implementation no longer supports union of all read-only branches?
Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists