[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A12868E.6030108@panasas.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:14:38 +0300
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
James Smart <James.Smart@...lex.Com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@....org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <Jens.Axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [SQUASHME] "FC Pass Thru support" fixed for block/for-2.6.31
tree
On 05/19/2009 01:05 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Boaz.
>
> Just two minor things.
>
> Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> /* we assume all request payload was transferred, residual == 0 */
>> - req->data_len = 0;
>> + req->resid_len = 0;
>>
>> if (rsp) {
>> - rsp_len = blk_rq_bytes(rsp);
>> - BUG_ON(job->reply->reply_payload_rcv_len > rsp_len);
>
> Maybe convert it to WARN_ON() instead of removing?
Sorry, You are absolutely correct should add it back. (With a WARN_ON)
>
>> /* set reply (bidi) residual */
>> - rsp->data_len = (rsp_len - job->reply->reply_payload_rcv_len);
>> + rsp->resid_len = blk_rq_bytes(rsp) -
>> + job->reply->reply_payload_rcv_len;
>
> With the fix-fallouts patchset it, this can be
>
> rsp->resid_len -= job->reply->reply_payload_rcv_len;
>
Sure.
> Other than above misc points,
>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
>
Will repost as reply to Original patch, thanks
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists