linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Staging: agnx: switch config_interface to bss_info

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a4423d670905190512x296f6b1cgaa7815fb4f17cac7@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 May 2009 16:12:50 +0400
From:	Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	gregkh@...e.de, johannes@...solutions.net,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: agnx: switch config_interface to 
	bss_info_changed

2009/5/13 Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>:
> 2009/5/12 Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>:
>> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 09:37:56PM +0400, Alexander Beregalov wrote:
>>> 2009/5/12 Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>:
>>> > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 03:23:13PM +0400, Alexander Beregalov wrote:
>>> >> Fix this build error:
>>> >> drivers/staging/agnx/pci.c: In function 'agnx_config_interface':
>>> >> drivers/staging/agnx/pci.c:315: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
>>> >> ..
>>> >> drivers/staging/agnx/pci.c:424: error: unknown field 'config_interface' specified in initializer
>>> >>
>>> >> config_interface was removed in 2d0ddec5b2b
>>> >> ("mac80211: unify config_interface and bss_info_changed")
>>> >
>>> > I do not see that patch in Linus's tree.  Is it in some other tree
>>> > (wireless?) and not yet in mainline?
>>> Yes, it is in wireless from linux-next.
>>> You asked to send patches based on linux-next, right?
>>> Should I always mark patches for staging-next tree as [PATCH -next] ?
>>
>> Hm, yes, -staging patches need to be against -next, but I have to be
>> able to build these somehow on my own without the wireless tree...
>>
>> I think something like this might better go through the wireless tree as
>> it depends on changes that happen there.  Sound good to you?
> Ok, thanks Greg.
>
>> If so, please send them to the wireless maintainer.
> John, will you apply it?

John?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/