[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090519123728.GA2377@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 14:37:28 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] xen /proc/mtrr implementation
* Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > - or introduce its own hypercall API based administration API,
> > without bothering the guest kernel with crap. Trivially patch Xorg
> > to make use of it and that's it.
>
> PCI pass through mixed with that isn't going to be fun and PCI
> pass through is one area where a lot of the MTRR manipulation is
> meaningful and valid (and can be handled for the guest).
virtualizing that aspect of the CPU properly is certainly the
highest grade approach.
> I really don't see why rd/wrmsr processing isn't sufficient for
> this
/me neither.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists