[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A12CC81.30108@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 08:13:05 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>
CC: mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 - UV fix for memory-only blades
Jack Steiner wrote:
> Fix an endcase in handling UV blades that have memory
> but no cpus. The calculation of the highest blade number
> failed to handle these blades if they appear last in the
> configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>
>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> Index: linux/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c 2009-05-15 12:00:59.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c 2009-05-15 14:38:16.000000000 -0500
> @@ -632,6 +632,7 @@ void __init uv_system_init(void)
> pnode = (paddr >> m_val) & pnode_mask;
> blade = boot_pnode_to_blade(pnode);
> uv_node_to_blade[nid] = blade;
> + max_pnode = max(pnode, max_pnode);
> }
>
> map_gru_high(max_pnode);
node_possible_map should already include nodes with memory and without memory already.
maybe you could skip max_pnode calculating in the loop.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists